Made public by LAFCO mailing to their list 3-17-99 and posting it to their website 3-20-00 to be heard at the 3-22-99 meeting
Index added by ValleyVote
Initial Data Collection And Fiscal Analysis
Step 1. Applicant Identifies Needs for Data Collection
Step 2. LAFCO Prepares a Request for Information
Step 3. Data Collection
Step 4. Review, Analysis of Data
Analysis Of Applicant's Proposals And City's Responses
Step 5. Applicant Reorganization Proposal
Step 6. Response to Applicant Proposal
Prepare Draft Comprehensive Fiscal Analysis
Step 7. Final Plan - Comprehensive Fiscal Analysis
Public Hearings
Preparation/Submittal Of Final Comprehensive Fiscal Analysis
The initial phase will involve the analysis of the services to be provided by the proposed new cities, and the development of the data collection process with the City. This phase will result in the preparation of a strategic plan by the Applicant for each proposed new city that will be the primary component of the application for Special Reorganization. The strategic plan will identify and describe the services to be provided by the proposed new cities and project its financial operations for three years. To index
PFM will meet with the Applicants to discuss the requirements of the Special Reorganization process and the expected PFM work plan. This first step of the seven-step process will conclude with the submission to LAFCO, by the Applicant, of a request for information from the City.
Task 1-1. Review and Analysis of Previously Collected Data
PFM will review and analyze data previously collected from the City and other affected parties.
Task 1-2. Prepare Guidelines for Development of Strategic Plan
PFM will meet with each Applicant to discuss the process for Special Reorganization, as set forth by the Cortese-Knox Act. PFM will discuss its work plan with each Applicant and describe the expected work products of the study, including the development of a strategic plan and initial fiscal analysis. PFM will assist LAFCO in providing the Applicants with guidelines for the development of the strategic plan in order to ascertain from the Applicants what services will be provided and how those services will be provided. The guidelines will also request that the Applicants identify the key decision-makers for the strategic plan development process.
Task 1-3. Review Services Proposed by Applicants
PFM will assist LAFCO in reviewing the services proposed by each Applicant, and assess whether the responses provided are sufficient to determine the information to be requested from the City.
Task 1-4. Review Applicants' Request for Information
PFM will review the request for information submitted by the Applicants, and assess whether the data requested is consistent with the services proposed by the Applicants, and consistent with the requirements of the Cortese-Knox Act. To index
PFM will assist LAFCO in the preparation of a request for information from the City based on the data request by the Applicants.
Task 2-1. Discuss Work Plan and Data Needs with City
PFM will meet with the City of Los Angeles and provide a formal presentation on the parameters and goals of the Comprehensive Fiscal Analysis, as well as the expected data requirements of the study. PFM will request that key City staff members be identified that can assist in the identification of municipal services currently provided in the proposed new cities, and of any constraints on the apportionment of those services.
Task 2-2. Prepare Request for Information
PFM will assist LAFCO in preparing a request for information from the City and other affected agencies. To index
The City of Los Angeles responds to LAFCO's request for information and provides comprehensive data. To index
PFM will assist LAFCO in the review and analysis of the data provided by the City, and identify any necessary clarifications or reformatting. Based on information provided by the City, PFM will facilitate each Applicant's effort to develop a strategic plan as part of the proposal for Special Reorganization. The strategic plan will be constructed as a three-year budget (modeled after the City of Los Angeles Budget) and will provide a description of services to be provided by the proposed new city and identify the funding sources and estimated costs of each service. The strategic plan will project the financial operation of each proposed new city to determine its financial viability. PFM will develop a computer model that will project the cash flow for each department and special revenue fund of the proposed new cities. Upon completion of the strategic plan, PFM will prepare an initial fiscal analysis (Tasks 4-9 and 4-10).
Task 4-1.Estimate Revenues Transferred to Proposed New Cities
PFM will identify all General Fund and Special Revenue currently contributed to the City by residents and business located within the proposed boundaries of the proposed new cities. PFM will develop projections of revenue for each proposed new city based on actual amounts and on any trends over the last three fiscal years. PFM will provide a discussion and analysis of major revenue items. PFM will project revenues for the general fund, special revenue funds, and enterprise funds of each proposed new city.
Task 4-2. Apportionment of Municipal Services and Costs to Proposed New Cities
PFM will identify the municipal services to be provided by the proposed new cities, based on the structure defined by the Applicants. During this phase, annual expenditure estimates will be derived for each service transferred.
For each City and proprietary department, a contact person at the City will be identified that can describe the specific assets and services to be transferred and provide the required budgetary data. A description of the services to be transferred and three-year cash flows will be developed for each department and special revenue fund.
For all support functions that are not specifically allocated by geographical area, PFM will initially (unless otherwise directed by LAFCO) apportion those services assuming the Applicants will retain a comparable organizational structure and level of services as currently maintained by the City.
Task 4-2(a). Administrative and Finance Departments
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures (if any) of the following City departments: City Administrative Officer, City Clerk, Council, Mayor, Bureau of Accounting, Bureau of Contract Administration, Board of Public Works, Treasurer, and Bureau of Engineering. This task will identify City-owned buildings located within the boundaries of the proposed new cities that could support administrative and governing functions.
Task 4-2(b). City Attorney
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the City Attorney's office. A governance structure and prosecution responsibility will be identified so that an accurate apportionment of personnel can be made.
Task 4-2(c). Control
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the Controller's office.
Task 4-2(d). Community Development
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the Community Development and Housing Departments. A review of existing and pending community development and housing grants will be undertaken. PFM will not undertake discussions with State and federal agencies involving the apportionment of existing grants.
Task 4-2(e). Fire
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the Fire Department. Existing stations and equipment within and in proximity to the proposed new cities will be identified and allocated.
Task 4-2(f). General Services
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of the General Services Department.
Task 4-2(g). Information Technology Agent
This task includes the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the Information Technology Agency. A review of on-going capital projects and equipment purchases will be undertaken.
Task 4-2(h). Personnel
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the Personnel Department.
Task 4-2(i). Planning
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the Planning Department.
Task 4-2(j). Police
PFM will review the current delivery of police service in the proposed new cities, and identify the specific personnel to be transferred, any additional personnel required for management of the new department, and the facilities and equipment required.
Task 4-2(k). Bureau of Sanitatio n
This task involves the analysis of service and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the Bureau of Sanitation. This task will identify specific alternatives of providing solid waste and sewerage services to the proposed new cities, and determine the capacity requirements for both proposed new cities.
Task 4-2(l). Street Services/Lighting
This task involves the analysis and apportionment and annual expenditures of the Bureau of Street Services and Bureau of Lighting. State and federal gas tax revenue attributable to each proposed new city will be identified and apportioned accordingly.
Task 4-2(m). Transportation
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the Transportation Department. This task will involve the computation of Proposition A and C Local Return sales tax revenue allocable to the proposed new cities. This task will also identify the existing transit service to be apportioned to the proposed new cities.
Task 4-2(n). Other Departments
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures (if any) of the following City departments: Aging; Animal Services; Building and Safety; Commission for Children, Youth and Their Families; Commission on Status of Women; Cultural Affairs; Department on Disability; Employee Relations Board; Environmental Affairs; Ethics Commission; Human Relations Commission; Los Angeles Convention Center; Bureau of Management-Employee Services; and Zoo.
Task 4-2(o). Airports
Execution of this task will depend whether the Applicant(s) request the apportionment of the Airports, and the structure of such an arrangement. PFM will describe the possible apportionment methods with the applicants and identify the fiscal advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the structure, PFM will identify the respective allocation of service and annual expenditures.
Task 4-2(p). Pensions
This task shall involve the review of existing legislation restricting the divestiture of the City retirement system and Police and Fire pension, and the review of the current funding status of each. A structure that may involve the creation of a separate or pooled pension fund will be identified.
Task 4-2(q). Harbor
Execution of this task will depend whether the Applicant(s) request the apportionment of the Harbor, and the structure of such an arrangement. PFM will describe the possible apportionment methods with the Applicants and identify the fiscal advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the structure, PFM will identify the respective allocation of service and annual expenditures.
Task 4-2(r). Library
This task involves the analysis and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the Library system. Existing libraries and equipment within and in proximity to the proposed new cities will be identified.
Task 4-2(s). Recreation and Parks
This task involves the analysis of service and apportionment of service and annual expenditures of the Recreation and Parks Department. Existing parks, golf courses, and allocable equipment within and in proximity to the proposed new cities will be identified.
Task 4-2(t). Water and Power
Execution of a majority of this task will depend whether the Applicant(s) request the apportionment of the Department, and the structure of such an arrangement. PFM will describe the possible apportionment methods with the Applicants and identify the fiscal advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the structure, PFM will identify the respective allocation of service and annual expenditures.
This task will identify any legal barriers to the divestiture or equity sharing of the water and/or power systems. This task may involve the estimation of any equity rights and the value of those rights as they relate to General Fund transfers. An analysis of the impact on any existing bondholders of any divestiture or apportionment plan will also be provided.
A determination of the feasibility of apportioning the City's "Pueblo water rights" will be undertaken. Alternatives other than ownership of the water system such as wholesale purchases from the Metropolitan Water Department will be identified and assessed.
Task 4-2(u). Community Redevelopment Agency
PFM will assess the apportionment of project areas within the boundaries of the proposed new cities and identify the debt, assets, and property tax revenues transferred to the proposed new cities. The CFA will assess the possibilities of debt repayment through a lump-sum payment or through ongoing debt service.
PFM will identify the historic equity contributions via sewer fees and capacity charges made by residents and business within the proposed new cities. Based on historic cost, PFM will identify the value of distribution lines within the boundaries of the proposed new cities, and system treatment and disposal facilities.
Options will be identified for a potential transfer of facilities and capacity rights to the proposed new cities. Capacity as a Contract Agency to the wastewater system will be determined and any rate differential (compared to current City rates) will be identified. Any payment to the City required for revenue neutrality will be identified. Legal analysis in regard to any payment to the City, in consideration of Proposition 218, will be undertaken. Capacity rights to reclaimed water will be identified based on an analysis of the Applicant’s respective equity contributions.
Task 4-4. Apportionment of Regional City-Owned Assets
Execution of this task will depend whether the Applicant(s) request the apportionment of any specific asset outside the boundaries of the proposed new cities, such as the Convention Center. To index
To the extent concerns of the City were not previously identified, PFM will address any responses from the City regarding the allocation of service and annual expenditures in each Applicant’s strategic plan. To index
Applicant submits proposal for Special Reorganization based on strategic plan and initial fiscal analysis. To index
PFM will develop a methodology for apportioning the City's investment portfolio to each proposed new city. Any risks associated with market loss, caused by divesting investments prior to maturity, will be identified. PFM will estimate the composition of the City’s portfolio after the secession, and determine whether the City's investment policy is maintained. Any reduction in City interest earnings because of the apportionment will be identified.
PFM will identify alternative scenarios for apportioning debt to the proposed new cities based on criteria that may include an analysis of the debt-financed assets transferred to the proposed new cities. If any debt is apportioned to the proposed new cities, a feasible payment arrangement will be developed and a review of bond covenants will be undertaken to determine the appropriateness of the apportionment. If a refunding of some debt is required or requested by the Applicants, PFM will compute the economic costs of the refunding.
PFM will identify any actions relating to the Special Reorganization that may result in costs based on the physical apportionment of personnel and physical assets, and actions associated with the construction of new facilities and purchase of equipment required in the management of new services. PFM will describe any additional services requested and defined by the Applicants that are not currently available from the City. Cost estimates for new facilities and equipment will not be provided by PFM.
Subsequent to the initial allocation of services and annual expenditures, PFM will review the aggregate structure of proposed new services and assess the operational feasibility of such a structure. Alternatives that may reconfigure, add or reduce services in order to more effectively deliver municipal services may be provided. PFM may identify potential cost saving initiatives that can reasonably be implemented during the three-year planning horizon of the CFA. PFM will meet with each Applicant to determine which initiatives, if any, will be incorporated into the strategic plans.
Based on the each Applicant's strategic plan, PFM will assess the fiscal impact on the City of the proposed transfer of revenue and apportionment of services and annual expenditures. PFM will use the estimates of revenue and annual expenditures set forth in the strategic plans to determine the amounts apportioned from the City for the next three years. If the City looses more revenue than the amount of expenditures transferred, PFM will identify the annual payment required by the proposed new cities to achieve revenue neutrality.
In addition to immediate reductions in cash flow due to the apportionment
of revenue, PFM will also assess the impact of any long-term fiscal impacts such
as salary ratcheting of public service employees, and diseconomies of scale.
Task 4-10. Assess Financial Viability of Proposed New Cities In accordance with
the requirements of the Cortese-Knox Act, PFM will project the operating cash
flows of each proposed new city and determine whether the cities are financial
viable and can maintain a reasonable level of reserves over the planning
horizon.
To index
Once each Applicant’s strategic plan is deemed feasible, PFM will
refine the Initial Fiscal Analysis, as needed, to ensure the CFA is accurate and
defendable. To index
PFM will develop a communication strategy to effectively relate the
Applicants’ and the LAFCO’s goals and objectives to the public, to
departments, to legislators, and to other affected organizations.
Task 7-2. Develop Communications Strategy
PFM will work with LAFCO to develop a communications strategy to present
its findings and identify the proper forum and medium to disseminate information
on the CFA.
Task 7-3. Public Hearings
PFM will assist LAFCO in presenting the results of the CFA to affected
stakeholders and will respond, as necessary, to any input. To
index
Task 7-4. Revise Draft Comprehensive Fiscal Analysis
PFM will further refine the Draft
CFA, upon direction from LAFCO, and submit a bound final draft of the
Comprehensive Fiscal Analysis to LAFCO.Prepare Draft Comprehensive Fiscal Analysis
Step 7. Final Plan - Comprehensive Fiscal Analysis
Public Hearings
Preparation/Submittal Of Final Comprehensive Fiscal
Analysis
To the ValleyVote home page
LAFCO main page page